Public Administrative Limitations in Business Development in Piura: A Case Study (2020-2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15588474Keywords:
Bureaucracy, transparency, regional development, case study, PiuraAbstract
This study examines the public administrative limitations hindering business development in Piura (2020–2023), combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. The findings reveal four key barriers: excessive bureaucracy (e.g., 140-day delays in procedures), inefficient regulations (duplicate requirements for exports), lack of transparency in tenders (reports of favoritism toward allies), and limited access to infrastructure (poor connectivity and energy in rural areas). These factors reduced investments, stagnated regional GDP, and perpetuated informality (only 30% of businesses are registered). The pandemic worsened administrative delays by closing in-person services. Recommendations include implementing integrated digital systems, simplifying sectoral norms, strengthening accountability mechanisms, and promoting partnerships between institutions and business chambers. The study emphasizes the need for targeted public policies focused on modernization and transparency to boost Piura’s competitiveness.
Downloads
References
Banco Central de Reserva (BCR). (2023). Estadísticas Regionales de Piura .
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology .
Cepal. (2021). Impacto de la pandemia en las microempresas de América Latina . Santiago de Chile.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research .
Ente Regulador de Telecomunicaciones. (2022). Conectividad en Piura .
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research .
Gobierno Regional de Arequipa. (2023). Modelo de Plataforma Única .
Gobierno Regional de Piura. (2021). Plan Estratégico de Desarrollo Regional 2021-2025 .
Gobierno Regional de Piura. (2022). Diagnóstico de Regulaciones Sectoriales .
Hair, J. F., et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis .
IDB. (2021). Burocracia y Competitividad en Perú .
IDB. (2021). Desafíos regulatorios en la agricultura peruana .
IDB. (2022). Burocracia y competitividad en América Latina: Un análisis por sectores . Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
INEGI. (2020). Encuesta de Empresas: Percepción sobre Barreras Administrativas .
INEI. (2022). Impacto de la Pandemia en las Microempresas .
INEI. (2023). Estadísticas de Empresas por Región: Piura . Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.
INEI. (2023). Encuesta Empresarial de Piura .
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry .
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative Research Design .
Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas. (2022). Reformas regulatorias exitosas en regiones peruanas .
Ministerio de Energía. (2023). Infraestructura en Zonas Rurales .
Ministerio de Justicia. (2022). Plataformas Digitales en Municipalidades .
Ministerio de Transportes. (2023). Infraestructura en Zonas Rurales .
OCDE. (2022). Transparencia en Contrataciones Públicas .
Organización Mundial de Comercio. (2020). Indicadores de Facilidad de Negocios .
Sunat. (2022). Tiempo Promedio de Trámites .
Transparencia por Perú. (2022). Denuncias de Corrupción en Licitaciones .
World Bank. (2021). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies .
World Bank. (2021). Impacto de la Pandemia en los Sistemas Administrativos .
World Bank. (2021). Recuperación Económica Post-Pandemia .
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors exclusively transfer the right to publish their article to our journal, which may formally edit or modify the approved text to comply with its own editorial norms and universal grammatical standards, before publication; Likewise, our journal may translate approved manuscripts into as many languages as it deems necessary and disseminate them in several countries, always giving public recognition to the author or authors of the research.
