Integración de criterios ASG y creación de valor corporativo: Un estudio longitudinal de datos de panel en mercados bursátiles latinoamericanos

Autores/as

  • Israel Ricardo Barrutia Villarán Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23420863

Palabras clave:

Criterios ASG, valor corporativo, datos de panel, mercados bursátiles latinoamericanos, revisión narrativa

Resumen

Este artículo de revisión narrativa analiza la integración de los criterios Ambientales, Sociales y de Gobierno Corporativo (ASG) y su impacto en la creación de valor corporativo dentro de los mercados bursátiles de América Latina, empleando la evidencia empírica proveniente de estudios longitudinales de datos de panel. A través de un recorrido crítico por la literatura académica, la investigación aborda la evolución conceptual de la sostenibilidad corporativa y contrasta las particularidades estructurales de la región —como la alta concentración de la propiedad, la escasez de datos estandarizados y las fricciones institucionales— frente a las economías desarrolladas. Asimismo, examina cómo los avances en las especificaciones metodológicas, tales como los estimadores de momentos generalizados en sistema, buscan mitigar la endogeneidad al evaluar el nexo entre el desempeño ASG y métricas financieras como la Q de Tobin o la rentabilidad bursátil. Los hallazgos revelan una literatura dividida entre efectos positivos, neutros y mixtos, donde los costos iniciales de implementación y el contexto institucional actúan como moderadores clave. Finalmente, se discuten las implicaciones prácticas para directivos e inversores institucionales, evidenciando que, pese a las barreras regionales, la sostenibilidad se consolida gradualmente como un motor estratégico de valor a largo plazo y se perfilan futuras líneas de investigación sobre taxonomías verdes y transición energética.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2018.143510

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Barnard, J. A., & McWilliams, A. (1990). In search of corporate social responsibility: An empirical test of corporate social performance and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 603-613. https://doi.org/10.5465/256585

Bassen, A., & Kovacs, A. (2008). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors and their influence on corporate performance in emerging markets. Zeitschrift für Corporate Governance, 3(5), 200-208.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597-1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2407

Crifo, P., Diaye, M. A., & Oueghuio, S. (2019). The economic and financial performance of ESG rating: Evidence from Latin America. Finance a Uver-Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 69(3), 220-245.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Dau, L. A. (2009). Structural reform and the changing strategic context of emerging market firms. Journal of International Management, 15(2), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.08.003

Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005

Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic internationalization and financial slack. Journal of Cleaner Production, 301, 126944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126944

Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance-sustainability gap: High sustainability companies perform better, but how can investors capture this value? Financial Analysts Journal, 69(6), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v69.n6.5

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 32-33.

Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913823

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147-1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00457

Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.005

Núñez, M., Velloso, J., & Da Silva, R. (2022). The value effect of sustainability: Evidence from Latin American ESG bond issuances. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2045612

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

Possebon, J., Da Silva, M., & Carvalhal, A. (2023). Taking ESG strategies for achieving profits: A dynamic panel data approach in MILA countries. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 30(59), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-03-2022-0065

Refinitiv. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) scores from Refinitiv. London: Thomson Reuters. https://www.refinitiv.com

Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

Weber, O., & Marley, E. (2012). Sustainability in Latin American corporate practices: Drivers and barriers. Sustainable Development, 20(3), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.478

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-10-16

Cómo citar

Barrutia Villarán, I. R. . (2026). Integración de criterios ASG y creación de valor corporativo: Un estudio longitudinal de datos de panel en mercados bursátiles latinoamericanos. Business Innova Sciences, 7(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23420863